Friday, August 19, 2022
HomeSEOWhy and find out how to delete content material in bulk for...

Why and find out how to delete content material in bulk for website positioning

Every time I point out deleting content material in bulk to shoppers or colleagues, I’m normally met with some type of skepticism or doubt. That is normally wrapped up in a number of totally different positions, all of which make sense. 

Many occasions, nice efforts had been made to provide this content material, and deleting it’s a blow to the feelings. Past the emotional hit is the monetary one – content material prices cash, and good content material prices actual cash. Throwing it away looks as if such a waste. 

After which there’s skepticism across the idea – why would deleting content material ever be a good suggestion? If Google doesn’t prefer it, they simply gained’t rank it, proper? Bummer, however let’s not throw the infant out with the bathwater, proper? It might rank sooner or later.

Now we have deleted content material in bulk on many web sites at our company, and a current case research I shared on Twitter surfaced plenty of questions. 

Let’s first dive into the concept of deleting content material from a theoretical level. Then, let’s have a look at the situation I used to be up in opposition to and why, on this case, deleting content material in bulk made sense. Lastly, the outcomes from our particular use case. 

Why delete content material?

There are a number of causes to think about deleting content material in bulk on a web site, however the two most pertinent are associated to low-quality content material and authority/relevance. 

Low-quality content material

Ever since Google launched the Panda replace in 2011, their algorithms have been on the hunt for low-quality content material. Panda has been completely embedded into the core algorithm now, so web sites not should be impacted by a selected algorithm replace to see the consequences of low-quality content material. 

Google evaluates low-quality content material on a page-by-page foundation however does combination the entire listed pages after they consider a web site for high quality. In different phrases, the standard of particular person articles can have an effect on how your total website ranks.

Higher put, here’s what Google’s Gary Ilves informed Search Engine Land’s Barry Schwartz about Panda:

“[Panda] measures the standard of a website just about by wanting on the overwhelming majority of the pages at the least. However primarily permits us to take [the] high quality of the entire website into consideration when rating pages from that exact website and alter the rating accordingly for the pages.”

Google’s John Mueller has additionally mentioned this idea a number of occasions, saying low-quality content material on one a part of your web site can have an effect on your total web site’s rankings.

Deleting the content material that Google determines as “low high quality” isn’t a silver bullet. Nonetheless, as half of a bigger technique geared toward bettering content material high quality and rising topical authority, it will possibly make sense. 

Right here’s a nice article on this idea by Glenn Gabe. 

Authority and relevance

Newer to the dialog than Panda is the idea of a web site having topical authority. That is intently associated, and oftentimes related, to the concept that Google’s algorithms have to see your content material as related to what your web site is an authority on. 

Mueller commented on this in a 2021 Workplace Hours, saying:

“For search engines like google and yahoo, you might be constructing out your repute of information on that subject. If Google can acknowledge {that a} website is sweet for the broader subject, then it will possibly floor that website for broader queries on the subject as nicely.”

There are lots of methods to construct topical authority, for instance:

  • Including backlinks from different web sites which can be authorities on the subject.
  • Controlling relevance by inner hyperlinks and anchor textual content. 

A favourite strategy to gaining topical authority is publishing plenty of extremely related, in-depth content material on the subject. With an excellent base of useful content material on a subject, Google is more likely to belief you for that subject by providing you with greater rankings.

Nonetheless, for a similar causes that this strategy works when completed proper, it will possibly additionally damage the web site when completed flawed.

Publishing content material about plenty of subjects, with out constructing out topical authority on every of these subjects, can dilute your web site’s total authority.

There are a number of methods to repair subjects that aren’t nicely constructed out. In an ideal world, you’d want to completely construct out that subject with a lot of wealthy, in-depth content material. Nonetheless, this takes time and a wholesome price range.

Deleting content material is usually an easier and faster strategy.

Let’s dive into one particular scenario.


The web site we had been engaged on primarily targeted on one product line within the trend area of interest. Since its inception in 2018, the model constructed content material round this product. The web site ranked nicely for quite a lot of phrases round this product. 

In mid-2019, the model began to broaden into two extra associated product strains. At a look, these three merchandise appeared to make sense as all of them fell underneath one umbrella. 

All through the primary a part of 2020, the web site began to realize some traction in rankings and natural visitors for these two new product strains. Nonetheless, June 2020 was the place that traction peaked. 

For the second half of 2020, visitors and rankings began to say no throughout all components of the web site. By early 2021, visitors was down 40% from its earlier June 2020 excessive.


It was tough to guage a lot of something in 2020, on condition that a lot of the world was shut down because of COVID-19 in the beginning, after which led to a flurry of pent-up spending. Every part from shopping for patterns to seasonal developments to visitors modifications needed to be taken with a big grain of salt. 

The drops for this web site weren’t sudden, like one thing you would possibly see from an algorithm replace. The visitors decline was regular however by no means dramatic or excessive. 

Nonetheless, whenever you remoted the URLs from the three totally different product strains, it turned fairly clear:

  • The oldest product and associated content material had been performing worse than in earlier years, however not dramatically worse. Nonetheless, newer content material that was revealed on this product silo was considerably slower to rank.
  • The 2 latest merchandise and associated content material had misplaced the overwhelming majority of their rankings and visitors.

Grouping “content material silos” when analyzing poor efficiency is a good way to find out the place issues could be. 

As well as, when isolating visitors and key phrase rankings from totally different silos, it’s essential to tell apart if the losses are occurring to at least one or two pages, or to the overwhelming majority of the pages within the silo. 

It’s frequent for a big share of visitors on a web site to return from solely a handful of pages. And, if one or two of these pages lose a number of key rankings, total website visitors can drop significantly. However it isn’t as if all pages skilled a visitors drop. 

Quite the opposite, when nearly all of pages in a silo lose visitors and key phrase rankings, it’s a a lot greater reflection on all the silo. 

Right here is an instance. We remoted the newer product strains, which revealed huge drops throughout the board. 

Comparison of keyword rankings for newer product lines, June 2020 to February 2021, using Ahrefs Organic Traffic report.
Evaluating key phrase rankings for newer product strains, June 2020 to February 2021, utilizing Ahrefs Natural Site visitors report.

When wanting on the similar report for the unique product and associated content material, visitors was much more steady. There was no progress, however there weren’t the massive drops that we noticed with the opposite product silos.

Comparison of keyword rankings for original product and related content, June 2020 to February 2021, using Ahrefs Organic Traffic report.
Evaluating key phrase rankings for the unique product and associated content material, June 2020 to February 2021, utilizing Ahrefs Natural Site visitors report.

Natural visitors charts in Google Analytics informed an analogous story.  

A comparison of organic traffic from the last week of January to the last week of the previous June, in Google Analytics.
Right here is without doubt one of the product phrases, evaluating natural visitors from the final week of January to the final week of the earlier June, in Google Analytics.

In abstract, we had been up in opposition to a number of challenges: 

  • Key phrase rankings, visitors, and gross sales for the 2 new product strains had dropped significantly. 
  • Key phrase rankings, visitors, and gross sales for the unique product line weren’t rising, even with new content material and hyperlinks going dwell. 

What to do

Taking a step again, it appeared clear that this may very well be an authority and relevance downside in Google’s eyes. For a number of years, this website solely revealed content material round one core subject. 

And whereas the brand new product strains appeared intently associated, that doesn’t imply that Google transferred that topical authority over to this new content material. 

In different phrases, increasing into new merchandise/subjects might need diluted the authority the positioning had in its authentic product.

Certain, these new product silos ranked nicely out of the gate, maybe counting on the positioning’s total authority for these early rankings. 

However, Google will generally change its thoughts on what your website is and isn’t an authority on, as we mentioned above.

This will make sense, particularly upon a deeper analysis:

  • Many of the backlinks to the positioning had been pointing to the primary product silo. 
  • Many of the constant visitors was going to the primary product silo.

Plan of motion

There are a number of viable methods to think about in such a scenario as this:

  1. Make investments closely into the silos which can be dropping, by producing a lot of nice content material, updating outdated content material and constructing niche-relevant backlinks.
  2. Delete the content material within the silos which can be dropping.
  3. Do nothing and hope Google modifications its thoughts concerning the silos

Situation #1 is pricey, time-consuming and there’s no assure it should work. 

Situation #2 is disappointing and removes the chance to rank for this content material sooner or later. There may be additionally no assure it should work. 

Situation #3 is sensible if you can also make the case that the content material ought to be rating. In different phrases, you might be 100% positive it’s the greatest content material on the subject. However, in the event you can’t make that case, then this route doesn’t make a lot sense. 

It’s actually powerful to guage in case your content material is actually deserving of being the #1 end result. I’ll say that all of us have a tendency to overestimate how good our personal content material is. 

For this particular situation, right here is the place we landed:

  • We didn’t assume the content material within the poorly performing silos was unhealthy, however it wasn’t the very best content material obtainable. 
  • There most likely wasn’t sufficient of it to completely set up topical authority, as a have a look at rivals confirmed that they had much more content material than we did.  
  • Moreover, the urge for food simply wasn’t there for a heavy funding in product silos that hadn’t even been confirmed but.

In situation #2, the concept is that you simply delete the content material silos that Google doesn’t deem you an authority on, thus elevating the general authority of the positioning. 

You additionally rebalance the relevance of the positioning.

That is what we got down to do.


As soon as we determined to delete the entire content material from the poorly performing silos, there was some work to be completed. 

We remoted the entire URLs to be deleted after which evaluated every URL to see if it had backlinks or not. 

We arrange 301 redirects from the entire URLs that had backlinks with the intention to protect the authority coming from these backlinks. We pointed these 301s to essentially the most related pages for every URL. In the long run, 26% of the URLs had been 301 redirected. 

For the remaining 74% of the URLs, we eliminated the content material and arrange 410 standing codes. Versus a 404 code, the 410 code instantly tells Google that this web page is not dwell

We opted to let plenty of the pages go “lifeless” with out redirects as a result of we needed Google to know that we not had content material on this subject. The 410 code gave this info to Google even quicker than the 404 code would. 

We adopted this up by operating a website crawl and fixing any inner hyperlinks that had been nonetheless pointing to 301 or 410 pages. 

All of this was carried out in the course of the closing two weeks of February 2021.


As soon as we had the entire pages deleted and vital redirects arrange, we knew it was a ready sport. 

Relying on how continuously Google crawls your website, it will possibly take some time for them to get by the entire deleted pages and re-index the pages in your website which can be nonetheless dwell. 

And, when it comes to seeing vital change on account of the entire deleted content material, this may usually take till the subsequent Core Algorithm Replace, and even additional. 

Gabe, amongst others, has talked about how restoration from Core Updates usually gained’t occur till subsequent updates “as a result of there are site-level high quality algorithms that refresh throughout broad core updates.”

Whereas we weren’t attempting to get well from a Core Replace on this scenario, that is what I sometimes anticipate when on the lookout for positive aspects from deleting content material in bulk. 

Nonetheless, we didn’t wish to simply sit on our palms. One other instrument we had at our disposal was to publish further content material concerning the subject we had been now 100% targeted on. 

Over the subsequent 5 months, we revealed 30 articles, starting from informational subjects to particular product evaluations. 

All through Q2 of 2021, rankings and visitors continued to erode slowly.

The primary Google Product Replace got here in April 2021, however nothing modified with this. Nonetheless, a number of months later, the June 2021 and July 2021 Core Updates hit, which had a big affect. 

From the low level in Might, visitors spiked 4.5x on account of the June/July Core Updates. Income jumped 3x from its earlier low. 

The outcomes actually invigorated us, however we observed that rankings and visitors began to slowly erode as we hit August and September 2021. It was gradual and delicate, however we had been attuned to this now. 

In consequence, we began publishing further content material all through This fall 2021 by publishing a complete of 56 articles. We began seeing positive aspects in December 2021. Provided that this can be a web site within the trend area of interest, you can argue that This fall has elevated demand. However, we noticed the visitors positive aspects had been matched by rating will increase. 

We began a 3rd content material push in March 2022, aiming to publish 15-20 articles monthly. 

Site visitors has now eclipsed its month-to-month excessive from July 2021, and Might 2022 is on observe to have its highest month of visitors ever. 

Income can also be up, with April 2022 income 97% greater than April 2021. Summer season and This fall are the largest gross sales seasons, so hopes are excessive that income will proceed to climb and exceed earlier highs. 


  • It’s nearly all the time higher to enhance the content material moderately than delete it. If you are able to do that, that needs to be your go-to. Nonetheless, as we all know, this isn’t all the time attainable, for quite a lot of causes. 
  • Deleting content material is just not a silver bullet, and it doesn’t work each time. Spend the time analyzing the main points of the web site’s particular scenario to find out if the use case strains up with when deleting content material is sensible. 
  • We deleted plenty of content material together with publishing a lot of new, topically targeted content material. In case you’re on the lookout for a real A/B check about deleting content material solely, this isn’t it. However the outcomes are compelling nonetheless.
  • Take note of topical authority, even in the event you aren’t affected by visitors drops. Google is continually tweaking the way in which its algorithm evaluates authority and relevance, and also you don’t wish to fall on the flawed facet of a Core Replace. 

For some niches, constructing topical authority is comparatively easy. Publishing high-quality content material that solutions the question may be sufficient.

Nonetheless, in different niches, constructing topical authority entails much more than simply publishing high-quality content material. Sourcing specialists to contribute to long-form content material items could be vital. Constructing high-quality, niche-relevant backlinks and model mentions could be wanted. And, in these instances, a wholesome period of time and endurance could be wanted. 

Both method, focus your efforts on establishing true topical authority. And whenever you fall quick, think about deleting content material in bulk as an possibility.

Opinions expressed on this article are these of the visitor writer and never essentially Search Engine Land. Employees authors are listed right here.

New on Search Engine Land

About The Creator

Jared Bauman is the Co-Founder and CEO of 201 Artistic, LLC. He’s a 20-year veteran within the digital advertising area and has spoken on giant instructional platforms equivalent to Artistic Dwell. Jared is the host of the Area of interest Pursuits podcast the place he interviews company about web site progress, website positioning and internet online affiliate marketing.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments